Tweet Review: Women’s Ordination

This post serves a simple purpose which is to clarify a teaching of the Catholic faith and give a brief reason why the teaching occurs.  Because it is considered by many to be controversial I would ask that any comment stay on the topic of this clarification.  This is not a place for Catholics who are unhappy with this teaching of the Church to vent any frustration, and any comment of that nature will not make it through moderation.  It is also not to be used as a debate on sacraments in general.  It is for any non-Catholic Christian to ask questions for clarification on why the Catholic Church only ordains men to the priesthood.

Earlier this evening, Mark Driscoll tweeted, “The Push to Ordain Female Priests Gains Ground,” and linked to this article from Time Magazine Online about several women who have attempted ordination in the Catholic Church.  While I don’t have  time to go into in depth I can clearly state that Mark Driscoll is incorrect on this point.  The push to ordain female priests in the Catholic Church has not gained any ground, because females cannot be ordained to the priesthood.  Unlike priestly celibacy, which is not a doctrinal issue but a custom, the all male priesthood is an issue of doctrine which cannot change.

When we speak of priesthood (Holy Orders), the oral tradition of the Church is pretty clear that Jesus only shared the ministerial priesthood with men and not women.  This is because a priest makes visible the spousal relationship between Christ the bridegroom and the Church, his bride.  This relationship is life giving.  A woman minister and a feminine Church cannot make this life giving relationship visible.  Thus, the “matter” involved in the sacrament of Holy Orders must be a man.  Even if a bishop tried to ordain a woman, the sacrament of Holy Orders will not occur.  It would be similar to baptizing a person using gasoline and without using the words that Jesus gave to us.

Our universal pastor, Pope John Paul II was very clear on this.  He explained that the Church will not ordain women to the priesthood because the Church does not have the authority to do so.  The women mentioned in the Time article he linked are not priests.  They simply simulated the sacrament and now they are pretending to be priests.  The Church does not believe this is a matter of “Canon Law.”  It is a matter Divine Law, and the Church cannot dispense from Divine Law.  There will never be women priests in the Catholic Church, no matter how popular the idea gets.

These women went through our “Church Discipline” and many of them were excommunicated.  Their actions should not be viewed as representative of the direction the Catholic Church is headed.

Mars Hill Church members and fans of Mark Driscoll (not to mention Mark Driscoll himself) would do well to avoid looking to the mainstream media for any sort of objective coverage of the Catholic Church.  For further reading I would recommend this post from the Ignatius Insight Scoop and the links at the bottom of the article.

UPDATE: An interesting discussion is happening on Facebook and people who believe women should be pastors and should not be pastors are both making good arguments using the Bible alone.  Churches that hold to the Bible and Sacred Tradition are united that women cannot be pastors, which I find interesting.

Advertisements

3 comments on “Tweet Review: Women’s Ordination

  1. Molly says:

    Just a thought on the European group wouldn’t disclose names because they don’t want to risk excommunication:

    As with any excommunicable offense, doesn’t excommunication occur at the time that the actual sin occurs? So it wouldn’t matter if their names were made public or if the Church knows who they are, because in abusing the Sacrament, they are automatically excommunicated. (They seem to confuse it with an American legal offense; as in, “if I never get caught or convicted, then I am not guilty.”)

    Please let me know– i just wanted to make sure I am correct on that point.

    • zeeehjee says:

      Molly – As far as I understand Canon Law, until very recently simulating an ordination did not incur automatic excommunication (Latae Sententiae is the Latin phrase). I believe that the recent statement by the Vatican did make a change to the law, however I’m having a difficult time tracking down the Motu Proprio that explains this. This change to Canon Law would have been made because simulating ordinations are more prevalent than they have been in the past. I’ll try to get the quote to you ASAP, but unfortunately ASAP might still be a while.

  2. […] ordained Catholics are considered laymen and lay women.  There is no such thing as ordained nuns, since women can’t be ordained.  So, in a move that is quite humorous to me, Mark tries to use his family history to prove that […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s